ISSN   1004-0595

CN  62-1224/O4

Advanced Search
WU Bo, ZHANG Chuanwei, QU Da, LI Zhen, WANG Tingjian, GU Le. Effect of Electrolyte Adsorption on Adhesion between Charged Surfaces in Aqueous Conditions[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2022, 42(6): 1207-1215. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2021205
Citation: WU Bo, ZHANG Chuanwei, QU Da, LI Zhen, WANG Tingjian, GU Le. Effect of Electrolyte Adsorption on Adhesion between Charged Surfaces in Aqueous Conditions[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2022, 42(6): 1207-1215. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2021205

Effect of Electrolyte Adsorption on Adhesion between Charged Surfaces in Aqueous Conditions

Funds: This project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2018YFB2000300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1737204) and the fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M693724).
More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    GU Le, E-mail: gule@hit.edu.cn, Tel: +86-18604510550

  • Received Date: September 05, 2021
  • Revised Date: November 23, 2021
  • Accepted Date: November 23, 2021
  • Available Online: November 13, 2022
  • Published Date: November 25, 2021
  • In order to investigate interfacial adhesion behaviors, normal interaction forces between negatively charged mica surfaces were directly measured in various electrolyte aqueous solutions at high ionic strength with the well-established surface forces apparatus technique, which had distance and force measuring resolutions of down to 1 Å and ~10 nN, respectively. In pure water, a weak but long-range electrostatic repulsion force between the surfaces was detected and this interaction force gradually increased as the surfaces were slowly approached. When approaching the surfaces to a separation of less than 50 Å, the lower mica surface supported by a cantilever spring suddenly jumped to the fixed upper mica surface because of the van der Waals attraction between the mica substrates, resulting in direct contact of the two mica surfaces at separation of 0 Å. Upon subsequently separating the two surfaces, an interfacial adhesive force of about −46.7 mN/m was measured when the lower mica surface jumped out of contact from the upper mica surface. In comparison, the electrostatic repulsion effect between the mica surfaces was totally screened in 0.1 mol/L K2SO4 solution due to high ionic strength and no interaction force was detected before the surfaces came into the similar jump-into contact. Since K+ ions electrostatically adsorbed onto the negatively charged mica surfaces robustly, the separation between the surfaces maintained at around 5 Å even though the surfaces came into hard wall contact, and the adhesive force measured at the jump-out moment was remarkably lowered to about −2.9 mN/m. In 0.1 mol/L Ca(NO3)2 solution, Ca2+ ions also bound onto mica because of electrostatic attraction, but the adsorption of Ca2+ ions induced a significant short-range hydration repulsion between the two surfaces, rather than electrostatic repulsion. Such hydration interaction force was not detected in the monovalent K2SO4 solution. The binding strength of Ca2+ ion hydration layers on mica was weak so that the adsorbed Ca2+ ions completely desorbed in relatively low load conditions, resulting in direct contact between the mica surfaces with adhesive force up to around −40.7 mN/m. The addition of Ca(OH)2 into 0.1 mol/L K2SO4 solution merely yielded a weak short-range repulsion and the adhesion status between the mica surfaces was virtually the same to that in the pure K2SO4 solution. Robustly adsorbed K+−Ca2+ mixed layers with strong hydration repulsion did not form on the mica surfaces in the 0.1 mol/L K2SO4 solutions mixed with Ca(OH)2. Polyelectrolyte poly(carboxylate ether) (PCE) adsorbed onto mica from 0.1 mol/L K2SO4 solution and the adsorption layer was around 50 Å thick. Strong long-range steric repulsion was detected between the opposing PCE adsorption layers, but the adsorbed PCE molecules were completely squeezed out from between the confined mica surfaces in moderate compression conditions, leading to weak interfacial adhesive contact as observed in the pure 0.1 mol/L K2SO4 solution. In contrast, poly(naphthalene sulfonate) (PNS) exhibited high adsorption strength on mica without any desorption even at hard wall contact level in 0.1 mol/L K2SO4 solution. The thickness and the maximum compression rate of the PNS adsorption layer were about 57 Å and 43.9%, respectively. The steric repulsion from the opposing PNS adsorption layers completely prevented the two mica surfaces from coming into the van der Waals attraction range, thereby thoroughly avoiding adhesive contact. Robust binding/adsorption is a necessary condition for adsorbed electrolytes to tune interfacial adhesion.

  • [1]
    雒建斌. 超滑与摩擦起源的探索[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(27): 2967–2978,2966

    Luo Jianbin. Investigation on the origin of friction and superlubricity[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(27): 2967–2978,2966
    [2]
    易双, 葛翔宇, 李津津. 液体超滑技术发展现状及展望[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 60(8): 617–629 doi: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2020.25.023

    Yi Shuang, Ge Xiangyu, Li Jinjin. Development and prospects of liquid superlubricity[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2020, 60(8): 617–629 doi: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2020.25.023
    [3]
    Luo Jianbin, Liu Min, Ma Liran. Origin of friction and the new frictionless technology—Superlubricity: Advancements and future outlook[J]. Nano Energy, 2021, 86: 106092. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106092
    [4]
    Zhang Jiawen, Zeng Hongbo. Intermolecular and surface interactions in engineering processes[J]. Engineering, 2021, 7(1): 63–83. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.017
    [5]
    Cui Chunyan, Liu Wenguang. Recent advances in wet adhesives: adhesion mechanism, design principle and applications[J]. Progress in Polymer Science, 2021, 116: 101388. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101388
    [6]
    Vakis A I, Yastrebov V A, Scheibert J, et al. Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: an overview[J]. Tribology International, 2018, 125: 169–199. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.02.005
    [7]
    He Feng, Xie Guoxin, Luo Jianbin. Electrical bearing failures in electric vehicles[J]. Friction, 2020, 8(1): 4–28. doi: 10.1007/s40544-019-0356-5
    [8]
    温诗铸. 材料磨损研究的进展与思考[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2008, 28(1): 1–5 doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2008.01.002

    Wen Shizhu. Research progress on wear of materials[J]. Tribology, 2008, 28(1): 1–5 doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2008.01.002
    [9]
    Said Z, Sundar L S, Tiwari A K, et al. Recent advances on the fundamental physical phenomena behind stability, dynamic motion, thermophysical properties, heat transport, applications, and challenges of nanofluids[J]. Physics Reports, 2022, 946: 1–94. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.07.002
    [10]
    Israelachvili J, Min Y, Akbulut M, et al. Recent advances in the surface forces apparatus (SFA) technique[J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2010, 73(3): 036601. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/73/3/036601
    [11]
    杨冬, 胡元中, 王慧, 等. 解理云母表面粘着特性的实验[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 45(8): 1076–1078 doi: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2005.08.019

    Yang Dong, Hu Yuanzhong, Wang Hui, et al. Adhesion characteristics of mica cleavage surfaces[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2005, 45(8): 1076–1078 doi: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2005.08.019
    [12]
    李志军, 冷永胜, 邹鲲, 等. 表面力仪及固体表面微观接触机理的实验研究[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2000, 20(5): 336–339 doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2000.05.004

    Li Zhijun, Leng Yongsheng, Zou Kun, et al. Experimental investigation of the contact mechanism of solid surfaces with a surface force apparatus[J]. Tribology, 2000, 20(5): 336–339 doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2000.05.004
    [13]
    张中威, 谭业发, 董贵杨, 等. 表面力仪的改进及溶液中DLVO理论的验证[J]. 化学研究, 2012, 23(3): 16–20 doi: 10.14002/j.hxya.2012.03.007

    Zhang Zhongwei, Tan Yefa, Dong Guiyang, et al. Improvement on surface force apparatus and verification of DLVO theory in solution[J]. Chemical Research, 2012, 23(3): 16–20 doi: 10.14002/j.hxya.2012.03.007
    [14]
    赵古田, 郭纬川, 谭启檐, 等. 电解质溶液中云母间表面力的测量[J]. 东南大学学报(英文版), 2013, 29(1): 57–61 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003−7985.2013.01.012

    Zhao Gutian, Guo Weichuan, Tan Qiyan, et al. Force measurement between mica surfaces in electrolyte solutions[J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2013, 29(1): 57–61 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003−7985.2013.01.012
    [15]
    谭启檐, 阚亚鲸, 赵古田, 等. 离子相关性对表面电荷倒置在混合电解质溶液中的影响机理[J]. 东南大学学报(英文版), 2020, 36(3): 285–291 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003−7985.2020.03.006

    Tan Qiyan, Kan Yajing, Zhao Gutian, et al. Effects of ion-ion correlations on surface charge inversion in mixture electrolyte solutions[J]. Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2020, 36(3): 285–291 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003−7985.2020.03.006
    [16]
    Misra R P, de Souza J P, Blankschtein D, et al. Theory of surface forces in multivalent electrolytes[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(35): 11550–11565. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01110
    [17]
    Brito E L, Filho E D S, Nogueira D O, et al. Dynamic light scattering in concentrated polyacrylamide solutions[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020, 602: 124933. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124933
    [18]
    Christenson H K, Thomson N H. The nature of the air-cleaved mica surface[J]. Surface Science Reports, 2016, 71(2): 367–390. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2016.03.001
    [19]
    Zeng Hongbo, Tian Yu, Anderson T H, et al. New SFA techniques for studying surface forces and thin film patterns induced by electric fields[J]. Langmuir, 2008, 24(4): 1173–1182. doi: 10.1021/la7017242
    [20]
    Briscoe W H, Titmuss S, Tiberg F, et al. Boundary lubrication under water[J]. Nature, 2006, 444(7116): 191–194. doi: 10.1038/nature05196
    [21]
    Meleshyn A. Potential of mean force for Ca2+ at the cleaved mica–water interface[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(41): 17604–17607. doi: 10.1021/jp9076323
    [22]
    McGuiggan P M, Israelachvili J N. Measurements of the effect of angular lattice mismatch on the adhesion energy between two mica surfaces in water[J]. MRS Proceedings, 1988, 138: 349–360. doi: 10.1557/proc-138-349
    [23]
    Ouni O, Derbel N, Jaïdane N, et al. The K+ hydration shell structure in non-polar and low-polar environments[J]. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 2012, 990: 209–213. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2011.10.008
    [24]
    Raviv U, Klein J. Fluidity of bound hydration layers[J]. Science, 2002, 297(5586): 1540–1543. doi: 10.1126/science.1074481

Catalog

    Article views (114) PDF downloads (41) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return