ISSN   1004-0595

CN  62-1224/O4

Advanced Search
LÜ Yanjun, LI Jie, JIANG Cheng, LI Pengzhou, ZHANG Yongfang, CHANG Huan. Surface Roughness Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Honing Cylinder Liner[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2022, 42(4): 728-741. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2021131
Citation: LÜ Yanjun, LI Jie, JIANG Cheng, LI Pengzhou, ZHANG Yongfang, CHANG Huan. Surface Roughness Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Honing Cylinder Liner[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2022, 42(4): 728-741. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2021131

Surface Roughness Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Honing Cylinder Liner

  • The surface machining quality of cylinder liner is usually evaluated by surface roughness Rk set, it is of great significance to establish a prediction model between roughness Rk set and machining parameters, and analyze the influence of machining parameters on honing quality of cylinder liner. Based on the rough honing experiments on cylinder liner under different honing pressure (P), different honing head rotation speed (VR) and different reciprocating speed (VRe), the values of the surface roughness Rk set were obtained. In order to predict the Rk, Rpk and Rvk of the surface roughness Rk set of the inner bore of cylinder liner during the rough honing process, and to optimize the honing parameters, the P, VR and VRe were taken as decision variables, and Rk roughness set was taken as the object response, multi-objective optimization was implemented to obtain the optimal machining parameters of P, VR and VRe. The roughness prediction models based on generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and response surface methodology (RSM) were established respectively. For the GRNN method, it was necessary to use the K-fold cross validation method to optimize the smoothing factor (i.e., spread), the value of the smoothing factor can greatly affect the prediction performance of the network. The minimum MSE can be obtained in the process of five-fold cross validation, the smoothing factor was 0.01 when the MSE had the minimum value. Twenty-one groups of experiment data were trained to achieve the prediction model by GRNN, and other 6 groups were regarded as test samples to verify the accuracy of the proposed model. The Box-Behnken Design (BBD) method of response surface method was used to design the experiment, and 17 groups of experiments were conducted to establish the response relationship between the honing parameters and the surface roughness Rk set. The surface roughness Rk set can be predicted by the optimized regression models based on RSM. And comparing with a full factorial honing test with three factors and three levels, the result showed that the prediction results obtained by the proposed models were in good agreement with the experimental results. The mean value of R2 of the coefficient of determination of GRNN prediction model was 0.959, the mean value of R2 of the coefficient of determination of the multiple regression prediction model established by RSM was 0.963. Comparing with the multiple regression prediction model established by RSM, the GRNN prediction model had higher prediction accuracy and smaller prediction error for prediction of Rk and Rpk, and R2 of Rk and Rpk increased by 0.025 and 0.020 respectively. The multiple regression model established by RSM was better than the GRNN prediction model when predicting Rvk, and R2 increased by 0.057. The influence significance of three decision variables on the roughness was analyzed by the RSM, and the ranking result for Rk was VRe > P > VR, for Rpk was P > VRe > VR, for Rvk was P > VRe > VR.In order to select the appropriate values of P, VR and VRe to make the Rk roughness set relatively small, based on the regression model established by the RSM, a multi-objective optimization was implemented to obtain the Pareto front of the Pareto optimal solutions by combining the multiple regression models with NSGA-II (non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II) optimization algorithm. More machining parameters combinations for rough honing of cylinder liner were provided to get high honing quality. Eight groups of optimum roughness values and the corresponding rough honing parameters of cylinder liner were given.
  • loading

Catalog

    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return