Citation: | YUAN Dujuan, CHEN Xiaoyang, LI Qingqing, QIU Liangwei, ZHANG Tao. Effects of Installation Directions on Dynamic Characteristics of Cage to Angular Contact Ball Bearing[J]. TRIBOLOGY, 2022, 42(4): 822-831. DOI: 10.16078/j.tribology.2021048 |
In order to study the dynamic characteristics of the cage, parametric modeling and analysis of angular contact ball bearings were implemented by using the secondary development of PCL (Patran Control Language) on the platform of finite element software MSC Patran/Ls-dyna. This simplified the pre-process and improved the modeling efficiency when the finite element software was applied to analyze the dynamic characteristics of bearings. Firstly, experiments were carried out by the research group’s paired bearing differential cage dynamic characteristics test device to validate the simulation results. The cage motion with the operating condition of the rotating inner ring and fixed outer ring was captured by the high-speed camera and its centroid trajectory was obtained by image processing technology. And the simulation results were verified through comparing with the literature results. There was good consistency in the shape of cage centroid trajectory and the trajectory radius between current simulation result and experimental or literature results, verifying the correctness of the current finite element model and the reliability of the simulation results. From this, the angular contact ball bearing with 7003C was selected to investigate the influence of different installation directions (horizontal and vertical installation direction) on the dynamic characteristics of the cage. This study was carried out from the following three aspects: the centroid trajectory of the cage in the radial plane, the displacement of the cage in the axial direction, and the maximum stress distribution of the cage. The results showed that due to gravity, the cage was easier to form a circular centroid trajectory for angular contact ball bearings with horizontal installation than vertical installation. When the bearing was installed vertically, the mass center of the cage oscillated irregularly and deviated from the center of the bearing due to the effect of gravity at a lower speed. However, at higher speeds, the cage was likely to form an approximate circular centroid trajectory. When the bearing was installed horizontally, the direction of gravity was consistent with the direction of the axial component of the force between the ball and the cage. Due to centrifugal force, the centroid trajectory at different speeds was approximately circular. The bearing with horizontal installation had a greater fluctuation range of the axial displacement than that with the vertical installation under different working conditions. When the bearing was installed horizontally, the gravity direction of the cage was along the axial direction, and the collision between the ball and the cage increased the resultant force of the cage in the axial direction, therefore, the axial vibration also increased. As the rotation speed increased, the fluctuation amplitude of the axial displacement in the two installation directions increased, while the fluctuation difference between the two installation methods decreased, suggesting that the installation direction had a greater impact on the movement of the cage at low speeds. Finally, the influence of different installation directions on the stress distribution was studied. Under low speed condition, the maximum stress of cage occurred at the lintel of cage for the vertical installation while at the side beam of cage for the horizontal installation. With high speed condition, the maximum stress of cage occurred at the lintel for both horizontal and vertical installation. What’s more, the vertical installation had a larger value of the maximum stress on the cage than horizontal installation at different speed condition.
[1] |
史修江, 王黎钦, 郑德志. 考虑动力学特性的航空发动机主轴球轴承热弹流分析[J]. 摩擦学学报, 2015, 35(4): 415–422 doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2015.04.009
Shi Xiujiang, Wang Liqin, Zheng Dezhi. Thermal EHL analysis of aero-engine mainshaft ball bearing with dynamic characteristics[J]. Tribology, 2015, 35(4): 415–422 doi: 10.16078/j.tribology.2015.04.009
|
[2] |
Nogi T, Maniwa K, Matsuoka N. A dynamic analysis of cage instability in ball bearings[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2018, 140(1): 011101. doi: 10.1115/1.4036451
|
[3] |
Schwarz S, Grillenberger H, Tremmel S, et al. Prediction of rolling bearing cage dynamics using dynamics simulations and machine learning algorithms[J]. Tribology Transactions, 2022, 65(2): 225–241. doi: 10.1080/10402004.2021.1934618
|
[4] |
Walters C T. The dynamics of ball bearings[J]. Journal of Lubrication Technology, 1971, 93(1): 1–10. doi: 10.1115/1.3451516
|
[5] |
Gupta P K, Paul B. Advanced dynamics of rolling elements[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1986, 53(3): 731–732. doi: 10.1115/1.3171847
|
[6] |
Wensing J A. On the dynamics of ball bearing[D]. Enschede: University of Twente, 1998.
|
[7] |
Weinzapfel N, Sadeghi F. A discrete element approach for modeling cage flexibility in ball bearing dynamics simulations[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2009, 131(2): 021102. doi: 10.1115/1.3063817
|
[8] |
Ashtekar A, Sadeghi F. A new approach for including cage flexibility in dynamic bearing models by using combined explicit finite and discrete element methods[J]. Journal of Tribology, 2012, 134(4): 041502. doi: 10.1115/1.4007348
|
[9] |
崔立, 时大方, 郑建荣, 等. 基于ANSYS/LS-DYNA的保持架动力学分析[J]. 机械传动, 2012, 36(6): 78–81,85 doi: 10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2012.06.020
Cui Li, Shi Dafang, Zheng Jianrong, et al. Dynamic analysis of cage based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA[J]. Journal of Mechanical Transmission, 2012, 36(6): 78–81,85 doi: 10.16578/j.issn.1004.2539.2012.06.020
|
[10] |
姚廷强, 谢伟, 谭阳. 角接触球轴承保持架柔性多体动力学分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2014, 25(1): 117–122 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2014.01.022
Yao Tingqiang, Xie Wei, Tan Yang. Flexible multi-body dynamics analysis on cage of angular contact ball bearings[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 25(1): 117–122 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2014.01.022
|
[11] |
邓四二, 谢鹏飞, 杨海生, 等. 高速角接触球轴承保持架柔体动力学分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2011, 32(5): 625–631
Deng Sier, Xie Pengfei, Yang Haisheng, et al. Flexible-body dynamics analysis on cage of high-speed angular contact ball bearing[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2011, 32(5): 625–631
|
[12] |
冯毅杰, 殷玉枫, 赵春江, 等. 角接触球轴承保持架动态特性有限元分析[J]. 轴承, 2020, 6: 1–6 doi: 10.19533/j.issn.1000-3762.2020.06.001
Feng Yijie, Yin Yufeng, Zhao Chunjiang, et al. Finite element analysis on dynamic characteristics of angular contact ball bearing cages[J]. Bearing, 2020, 6: 1–6 doi: 10.19533/j.issn.1000-3762.2020.06.001
|
[13] |
涂文兵, 何海斌, 刘乐平, 等. 转速波动条件下圆柱滚子轴承动态特性分析[J]. 机械强度, 2019, 41(5): 1201–1205 doi: 10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2019.05.029
Tu Wenbing, He Haibin, Liu Leping, et al. Analysis on dynamic characteristics of cylindrical roller bearing under the condition of rotational speed fluctuations[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2019, 41(5): 1201–1205 doi: 10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2019.05.029
|
[14] |
呙如兵, 时大方, 张晶, 等. 冲击工况下高速圆锥滚子轴承保持架动力学分析[J]. 轴承, 2021, 6: 7–12,20 doi: 10.19533/j.issn.1000-3762.2021.06.002
Guo Rubing, Shi Dafang, Zhang Jing, et al. Dynamic analysis on high-speed tapered roller bearing cage under impact conditions[J]. Bearing, 2021, 6: 7–12,20 doi: 10.19533/j.issn.1000-3762.2021.06.002
|
[15] |
Kingsbury E P. Torque variations in instrument ball bearings[J]. A S L E Transactions, 1965, 8(4): 435–441. doi: 10.1080/05698196508972113
|
[16] |
立石佳男, 杨金容. 角接触球轴承保持架的动态涡动[J]. 国外轴承技术, 1995(3): 14–21
Tateishi Jianan, Yang Jinrong. Dynamic whirl of cage of angular contact ball bearing[J]. Foreign Bearing Technology, 1995(3): 14–21
|
[17] |
黄迪山. 微型轴承保持架质心轨迹检测与特性分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(15): 1779–1784 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2012.15.004
Huang Dishan. Detection and characteristic analysis for mass center orbit of bearing cage[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 23(15): 1779–1784 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2012.15.004
|
[18] |
Wen Baogang, Ren Hongjun, Zhang Hao, et al. Experimental investigation of cage motions in an angular contact ball bearing[J]. ARCHIVE Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part J Journal of Engineering Tribology, 2017, 231(8): 1041–1055. doi: 10.1177/1350650116689457
|
[19] |
Han Qingkai, Wen Baogang, Wang Meiling, et al. Investigation of cage motions affected by its unbalance in a ball bearing[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K:Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics, 2018, 232(2): 169–182. doi: 10.1177/1464419317727197
|
[20] |
段磊, 陈晓阳, 张涛. 基于Nastran的球轴承接触问题有限元分析[J]. 轴承, 2015, 9: 7–11 doi: 10.19533/j.issn.1000-3762.2015.09.003
Duan Lei, Chen Xiaoyang, Zhang Tao. Finite element analysis on contact problem for ball bearings based on nastran[J]. Bearing, 2015, 9: 7–11 doi: 10.19533/j.issn.1000-3762.2015.09.003
|
[21] |
崔静. 基于显式动力学的滚动轴承建模与分析[D]. 北京: 北京化工大学, 2014
Cui Jing. Dynamics simulation and modeling of rolling bearing based on finite element analysis[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2014 (in Chinese)
|
[22] |
王林泉, 陈晓阳, 张涛, 等. 高速球轴承保持架动态特性试验方案设计[J]. 轴承, 2019, 2: 31–35 doi: 10.19533/j.issn.1000-3762.2019.02.008
Wang Linquan, Chen Xiaoyang, Zhang Tao, et al. Design of test scheme for dynamic characteristics of high speed bali bearing cages[J]. Bearing, 2019, 2: 31–35 doi: 10.19533/j.issn.1000-3762.2019.02.008
|
[23] |
薛丽霞, 李涛, 王佐成. 一种自适应的Canny边缘检测算法[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2010, 27(9): 3588–3590 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2010.09.106
Xue Lixia, Li Tao, Wang Zuocheng. Adaptive canny edge detection algorithm[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2010, 27(9): 3588–3590 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2010.09.106
|
[24] |
韩涛, 杨洋. 基于Hough变换的图像目标检测与识别[J]. 计算机与数字工程, 2019, 47(2): 412–416 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9722.2019.02.032
Han Tao, Yang Yang. Image object detection and recognition based on Hough transform[J]. Computer and Digital Engineering, 2019, 47(2): 412–416 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9722.2019.02.032
|
[25] |
Li Qingqing, Chen Xiaoyang, Zhang Tao, et al. Experimental research on cage dynamic characteristics of angular contact ball bearing[J]. Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20(2): 204. doi: 10.1051/meca/2019007
|
1. |
刘逸林,张盼,晁奔,闫柯,洪军. 采用自主图像处理程序的非侵入式滚动轴承保持架运动轨迹提取方法. 西安交通大学学报. 2024(03): 95-105 .
![]() | |
2. |
董应伟,余光伟,肖扬,潘友君,李文海. 变工况下深沟球轴承保持架动态特性分析. 机械强度. 2024(06): 1507-1514 .
![]() |